Real Numbers
Theorem (Euclid’s Division Lemma):
For a pair of given positive integers ‘a’ and ‘b’, there exist unique integers ‘q’ and ‘r’ such thatThus, for any pair of two positive integers a and b; the relation
Example:-
(a) 20, 8
Let 20 = a and 8 = b
(b) 17, 5
Let 17 = a and 5 = bExercise 1.1 (NCERT Book)
Question - 1: Use Euclid’s division algorithm to find the HCF of:
(i) 135 and 225 (ii) 196 and 38220 (iii) 867 and 255
Solution: (i) 135 and 225
In the given problem, let 225 = a, and 135 = bThus, Answer: 45
Solution: (ii) 196 and 38220
In the given pair, 38220 > 196, thus let 38220 = a and 196 = bNow by applying the Euclid’s division algorithm, we get
Answer: 196
Solution:- (iii) 867 and 255
Let a = 867 and b = 255, thus after applying the Euclid’s division algorithm we get867 = 255 X 3 + 102 ( Where r = 102)
Since, r ≠ 0, therefore, by taking 255 and 102 as a and b respectively we get
255 = 102 X 2 + 51
Similarly, 102 = 51 X 2 + 0 (Where, r = 0)
Since, in this term r = 0, thus HCF of the given pair 867 and 255 is equal to 51
Answer: 51
Question - 2 – Show that any positive odd integer is of the form 6q + 1 or, 6q +3 or, 6q + 5, where q is some integer.
Solution: Let ‘a’ be any positive odd integer and ‘b = 6’.
Therefore,
By placing r = 1, we get, a = 6q +1
By placing, r = 2, we get, a = 6q + 2
By placing, r = 3, we get, a = 6q + 3
By placing, r = 4, we get, a = 6q + 4
By placing, r = 5, we get, a = 6q +5
Thus, a = 6q or, 6q +1 or, 6q + 2 or, 6q + 3 or, 6q + 4 or, 6q +5
But here, 6q, 6q + 2, 6q +4 are the even integers
Therefore, 6q + 1 or, 6q + 3 or, 6q + 5 are the forms of any positive odd integers.
Alternate Method: Assume any value for q; like 1, 2, 3, ………….n
If q = 1;
Then;
Another rationale for this can be as follows:
Since 6 is an even number and product of any number with an even
number is always an even number. Moreover, if an odd number is added to
any even number, we get an odd number as result.
Question: 3 – An army contingent of 616 members is to
march behind an army band of 32 members in a parade. The two groups are
to march in the same number of columns. What is the maximum number of
columns in which they can march?
Solution: The required number of column is obtained by the HCF of 616 and 32Let, a = 616 and b = 32, therefore, by applying Euclid’s division algorithm, we get
616 = 32 X 19 + 8, since, here r = 8 and ≠ 0, thus, by continuing the process, we get
32 = 8 X 2 + 0, here r = 0
Thus, the HCF of 616 and 32 is equal to 8
Thus, the required maximum number of column = 8
Question: 4 – Use Euclid’s division lemma to show that
the square of any positive integer is either of the form 3m or 3m +1
for some integer m.
[Hint: Let x be any positive integer then it is of the form 3q, 3q
+1 or 3q + 2. Now square each of these and show that they can rewritten
in the form 3m or 3m +1] Solution: Let ‘n’ is any positive integer, then it is of the form of 3q or, 3q + 1 or, 3q + 2
Alternate method:
Let us start with the smallest square number, i.e. 4
Question: 5 – Use Euclid’s division lemma to show that the cube of any positive integer is of the form 9m, 9m + 1 or 9m + 8.
Solution: Let ‘a’ is a positive integer and b = 4
Therefore, according Euclid’s division lemma
Alternate method:
Let us start with the smallest cube number, i.e. 8 Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic:
Every composite number can be expressed (factorised ) as a product of primes, and this factorisation is unique, apart from the order in which the prime factors occur.This theorem also says that the prime factorisation of a natural number is unique, except for the order of its factors.
For example 20 can be expressed as 2 × 2 × 5
Using this theorem the LCM and HCF of the given pair of positive integers can be calculated.
LCM = Product of the greatest power of each prime factor, involved in the numbers.
HCF = Product of the smallest power of each common prime factor in the numbers.
Exercise 1.2 (NCERT Book)
Question: 1 - Express each number as a product of its prime factors:
(i) 140 (ii) 156 (iii) 3825 (iv) 5005 (v) 7429
Solution: (i) 26 and 91 (ii) 510 and 92 (iii) 336 and 54
Solution:-
(i) 26 and 91
The prime factors of 26 = 2 × 13 The prime factors of 91 = 7 × 13
Therefore, LCM = 2 × 7 × 13 = 182
And, HCF = 13
Now, LCM × HCF = 182 × 13 = 2366
Product of given numbers = 26 × 91 = 2366
Therefore, LCM × HCF = Product of the given two numbers
(ii) 510 and 92
The prime factors of 510 = 2 × 3 × 5 × 17 The prime factors of 92 = 2 × 2 × 23
Therefore, LCM = 2 × 2 × 3 × 5 × 17 × 23 = 23460
And, HCF = 2
Now,
LCM × HCF = 23460 × 2 = 46920
Product of given two Numbers = 510 × 92 = 46920
Therefore, LCM × HCF = Product of given two numbers
(iii) 336 and 54
The prime factors of 336 = 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 × 3 × 7 = 24 × 3 × 7The prime factors of 54 = 2 × 3 × 3 × 3 = 2 × 33
Therefore, LCM of 336 and 54 = 24 × 33 × 7 = 3024
And, HCF = 2 × 3 = 6
Now, LCM × HCF = 3024 × 6 = 18144
And the product of given numbers = 336 × 54 = 18144
Therefore, LCM × HCF = Product of given numbers
Question: 3. Find the LCM and HCF of the following integers by applying the prime factorization method.
(i) 12, 15 and 21 (ii) 17, 23 and 29 (iii) 8, 9 and 25
Solution:-
(i) 12, 15 and 21
Prime factors of 12 = 2 × 2 × 3 = 22 × 3Prime factors of 15 = 3 × 5
Prime factors of 21 = 3 × 7
Therefore, LCM = 2 × 2 × 3 × 5 × 7 = 420
HCF = 3
(ii) 17, 23 and 29
Prime factors of 17 = 17 × 1Prime factors of 23 = 23 × 1
Prime factors of 29 = 29 × 1
Therefore, LCM = 17 × 23 × 29 = 11339
And HCF = 1
(iii) 8, 9 and 25
Prime factors of 8 = 2 × 2 × 2 = 23Prime factors of 9 = 3 × 3 = 32
Prime factors of 25 = 5 × 5= 52
Therefore, LCM = 23 × 32 × 52 = 8 × 9 × 25 = 1800
Since, there is no common factors among the prime factors of given three numbers,
Thus HCF = 1
Question: 4. Given that HCF (306, 657) = 9, find LCM (306, 657).
Solution:-
Question: 5. Check whether 6n can end with the digit 0 for any natural number n.
Solution:- Numbers that ends with zero are divisible by 5 and 10. Simultaneously they are divisible by 2 and 5 both.
If the number 6n will be divisible by 2 and 5, then, it will end with the digit 0 otherwise not.
Prime factor of 6n = (2 × 3) n
Since, 5 is not a prime factor of 6n
Therefore, for any value of n, 6n will not be divisible by 5.
Therefore, 6n cannot end with the digit 0 for any natural number n.
Note: 6n always has 6 at unit’s place. Following examples illustrate this:
61 = 6
62 = 36
63 = 216
64 = 1296
Hence, 6n can never end with the digit zero for any natural number n.
Question: 6. Explain why 7 × 11 × 13 + 13 and 7 × 6 × 5 × 4 × 3 × 2 × 1 + 5 are composite numbers.
Solution: Numbers which have at least one factor other than 1 and number itself are called composite numbers.
Given, first expression:7 × 11 × 13 + 13
= 13 × (7 × 11 + 1)
= 13 × (77 + 1)
= 13 × 78
Since, given expression 7 × 11 × 13 + 13 has two prime factors other than 1, thus it is a composite number.
Second expression:
7 × 6 × 5 × 4 × 3 × 2 × 1 + 5
= 5 ( 7 × 6 × 4 × 3 × 2 × 1 + 1)
= 5 (1008 + 1)
= 5 × 1009
Since, the given expression has two factors other than 1, thus it is a composite number.
Question: 7. There is a circular path around a sports
field. Sonia takes 18 minutes to drive one round of the field, while
Ravi takes 12 minutes for the same. Suppose they both start at the same
point and at the same time, and go in the same direction. After how many
minutes will they meet again at the starting point?
Solution: Since, they will take different times to complete one round of the sports field. Thus, time after which they will meet again at the starting point will be given by the LCM of time taken to complete one round for each of them.
Time taken by Sonia to complete one round = 18 minute
Time taken by Ravi to complete one round = 12 minute
Prime factors of 18 = 2 × 3 × 3 = 2 × 32
Prime factors of 12 = 2 × 2 × 3 = 22 × 3
Therefore, LCM = 22 × 32 = 4 × 9 = 36
Thus, after starting simultaneously Ravi and Sonia will meet at starting point after 36 minute.
NCERT Solution - Exercise - 1.3
Question – 1 - Prove that
is irrational.
Answer: Let us assume the contrary, i.e.
is irrational.
is irrational.
Thus, there can be two integers a and b (b≠0) and a and b are coprime so that;
Squaring on both sides, we get;
This means that a2 is divisible by 5 and hence a is also divisible by 5.
This contradicts our earlier assumption that a and b
are coprime, because we have found 5 as at least one common factor of a
and b.
This also contradicts our earlier assumption that
is irrational.
is irrational.
Question – 2 - Prove that
is irrational.
Answer: Let us assume to the contrary, i.e.
is irrational.
is irrational.
Thus, there can be two integers a and b (b≠0) and a and b are coprime so that;

Since a and b are rational, so
is rational and hence,
is rational.
is rational and hence,
is rational.
But this contradicts the fact that
is irrational.
is irrational.
This happened because of our faulty assumption.
Question – 3 - Prove that following are irrationals:
Answer: Let us assume to the contrary, i.e.
is rational.
is rational.
Thus, there can be two integers a and b (b≠0) and a and b are coprime so that;
Squaring on both sides, we get;
This means that b2 is divisible by 2 and hence a is also divisible by 2.
This contradicts our earlier assumption that a and b are co-prime, because 2 is at least one common factor of a and b.
This also contradicts our earlier assumption that
is rational.
is rational.
Hence,
is irrational proved.
is irrational proved.
Answer: Let us assume to the contrary, i.e.
is rational.
is rational.
There can be two integers a and b (b≠0) and a and b are coprime, so that;
Squaring on both sides, we get;
This means that a2 is divisible by 245; which means that a is also divisible by 245.
This contradicts our earlier assumption that a and b are coprime, because 245 is at least one common factor of a and b.
This happened because of our faulty assumption and hence,
is irrational proved.
is irrational proved.
Answer: Let us assume to the contrary, i.e.
is rational.
is rational.
Thus, there can be two integers a and b (b≠0) and a and b are coprime so that;
Since a and b are rational, so
is rational and hence,
is rational.
is rational and hence,
is rational.
But this contradicts the fact that
is irrational.
is irrational.
This happened because of our faulty assumption.
Hence,
is irrational proved.
is irrational proved.
No comments:
Post a Comment